|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 15-17
Cross-sectional study of macular thickness variations in unilateral amblyopia
Siddharth Agrawal, Vinita Singh, Vivek Singhal
Department of Ophthalmology, King Georges' Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
|Date of Submission||15-Mar-2013|
|Date of Acceptance||07-Jun-2013|
|Date of Web Publication||3-Dec-2013|
Department of Ophthalmology, King Georges' Medical University, Lucknow - 226 003, Uttar Pradesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the mean macular thickness between normal and amblyopic eyes in unilateral strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Materials and Methods: A spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Inc.) was used to evaluate 51 patients (mean age 11.63 ± 2.84 years) with unilateral strabismic (n = 29) and anisometropic (n = 22) amblyopia. Data between the two eyes were compared using a paired t-test and a P value <0.05 was considered as significant. Results: Mean best-corrected visual acuity was +0.53 LogMAR (range 0.2-1.0) in the amblyopic eye. Mean macular thickness in the amblyopic eyes was 277.5 μ ± 15.3 and in the fellow normal eyes was 272.4 μ ± 13.1 (P < 0.05). On subgroup analysis, the difference was statistically significant in strabismic (P = 0.01) and not significant in anisometropic amblyopia (P = 0.08). Conclusion: The mean macular thickness was greater in amblyopic eyes as compared to the normal fellow eyes, and this difference was significant in strabismic amblyopia, but not significant in anisometric amblyopia.
Keywords: Amblyopia, anisometropia, macular thickness, optic coherence tomography, strabismus
|How to cite this article:|
Agrawal S, Singh V, Singhal V. Cross-sectional study of macular thickness variations in unilateral amblyopia. J Clin Ophthalmol Res 2014;2:15-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Agrawal S, Singh V, Singhal V. Cross-sectional study of macular thickness variations in unilateral amblyopia. J Clin Ophthalmol Res [serial online] 2014 [cited 2022 Jun 28];2:15-7. Available from: https://www.jcor.in/text.asp?2014/2/1/15/122630
The prevalence of amblyopia among children considered to be 1.6-3.5% varies depending upon selection criteria and population. , Anisometropic and/or strabismic amblyopia account for the majority, nearly over 90% of all amblyopia. The deleterious effect of amblyopia on the cell growth of the lateral geniculate body has been well-established by quantitative histologic studies in several animal species and in humans. ,, Retinal involvement accompanying amblyopia is poorly understood. It was hypothesized that amblyopia may affect the postnatal maturation of the retina including the postnatal reduction of retinal ganglion cells.  The process of postnatal reduction of ganglion cells requires sharply focused objects as appropriate stimuli.  However, the initial neural site of the visual deficit in this condition is still under investigation and studies that have observed the presence of retinal modifications in amblyopic eyes remain inconclusive and controversial.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a technology with good reproducibility in measuring macular thickness. , Its application in young children has been demonstrated. ,, Some studies have found increased mean macular thickness in amblyopic eyes while others have found no significant differences. ,,,, Few studies even observed macular thinning in amblyopic eyes.  This study was aimed to assess the effect of amblyopia on the mean macular thickness. This information may be useful in understanding the anatomical changes in amblyopia and in predicting treatment outcomes.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This was a prospective cross-sectional study, conducted after clearance from the local ethics committee. Patients in the age group of 5-15 years attending the pediatric vision clinic of our Institute and having unilateral amblyopia were included over a 1 year period (July 2011 to June 2012). Amblyopia was defined as the difference of ≥0.2 between the two eyes on LogMAR scale. Anisometropic amblyopia was defined as ≥1.00 D interocular difference in refractive error with no manifest squint while strabismic amblyopia was defined as manifest squint, near or distance and/or eccentric fixation and ≤0.75 D interocular difference. 
All patients underwent a detailed history and ocular examination, including orthoptic evaluation and dilated fundus examination. Subjects with any other ocular disease or having a history of any surgical intervention were excluded. Patients with a refractive error of greater than 5.0 D, uncooperative for OCT or having signal strength less than 5 (on a 10-point scale) in either eye were also excluded from the study.
OCT scanning was performed using OCT Cirrus high definition OCT (Carl Zeiss, Meditech Inc., CA, USA). In every case right eye was tested first, followed by the left eye.
The macular thickness map scan protocol was used for macular thickness measurements [Figure 1]. The mean of these values was used to calculate the average macular thickness. Measurement of retinal thickness at selected points on the tomographs was obtained automatically by means of a computer algorithm, which assumes that the first highly reflective band corresponds to the vitreo-retinal interface and the second corresponds to the retinal pigment epithelium.
|Figure 1: Map diameters centered on fovea (left) and nine standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study regions (right). The macula is divided into nine regions with three concentric rings measuring 1 mm (innermost ring), 3 mm (inner ring) and 6 mm in diameter (outer ring) centered on the fovea with inner and outer ring being divided into four quadrants each|
Click here to view
All measurements were performed by a single person trained in performing OCT who was blind to the diagnosis.
Data was compiled at the end of 12 months and subjected to statistical analysis. Data was presented as mean ± standard deviation. A 95% of the confidence interval and 5% level of significance were adopted; therefore, results with a P value ≤ 0.05 were considered as significant. All descriptive statistics were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software for Windows (version 17.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL).
| Results|| |
During the study period, 102 eyes of 51 patients were taken up for this cross-sectional analysis. A total of 29 patients were having strabismic and 22 were having anisometropic amblyopia. Out of 51 patients, 26 were males and 25 were females. The mean age of the patients was 11.63 ± 2.84 years. The age distribution of the patients in the two categories is described in [Table 1]. The mean best corrected visual acuity in amblyopic eyes was 0.53 ± 0.35 and in fellow normal eyes was −0.02 ± 0.05. The distribution of the same in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopic patients is described in [Table 1].
|Table 1: Demographic and visual acuity data the mean age and visual acuity of amblyopic eyes in both groups are statistically similar|
Click here to view
The overall mean macular thickness in amblyopic and fellow normal eyes and distribution in strabismic and anisometropic patients has been depicted in [Table 2].
|Table 2: Macular thickness measurements comparing the amblyopic with the normal eye|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The amblyopic process may have an effect on various levels of the visual pathway. Atrophy involving the cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus that receive input from the amblyopic eye has been reported.  However, retinal involvement in the amblyopic eye is controversial. 
Several experiments have demonstrated that retinal ganglion cells can suffer modifications with visual stimulus deprivation from birth; including cell loss, mean nucleolar volume diminution in ganglion cell cytoplasm and internal plexiform layer thinning in rats and cats with reduction in the optic nerve size area in mice.  Arden and Wooding reported that electroretinograms elicited by patterned stimuli in humans with various types of amblyopia were significantly reduced.  These results suggest that in humans, amblyopia may be associated with changes in retinal function at the level of production of the pattern electroretinograms, which is presumed to be pre-ganglionic.
Differences in magnification between the eyes have been a concern with optic nerve imaging including OCT.  When the amblyopic eye is more hypermetropic, magnification would increase the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurement. A recent cross-sectional study in children found that the RNFL was 1.67 microns thicker per D of hypermetropia. 
To reduce this potential concern, we performed intra-patient comparisons and did not enroll patients with myopia or hypermetropia >5.00 D.
Mean macular thickness of amblyopic eyes was found to be higher as compared with fellow normal eyes, the difference was significant statistically (P < 0.05), similar to other studies. ,,
The difference in mean macular thickness between amblyopic and fellow normal eye in our study was 4.4 μm. This difference is statistically significant (P < 0.05), but lower in comparison with few other reports. ,
The difference in mean macular thickness between normal and amblyopic eye was found to be significant statistically in strabismic (P = 0.01) but, not in anisometropic (P = 0.08) amblyopia. Other reports provide varied results. ,,
The variations in results of these reports are probably due to different study populations, defining criteria and type of amblyopia, different instruments used to measure the macular thickness and co-existent factors like refractive errors.
It is unclear why there is a difference in macular thickness between amblyopia associated with strabismus versus refractive error when the visual acuity in both groups are comparable (P = 0.69). Although strabismic and uncorrected refractive amblyopias are both characterized by decreased visual acuity, psycho-physical investigations have revealed substantial differences in the visual characteristics of humans with different types of amblyopia. ,, The findings suggest that different neural losses are associated with amblyopias of different etiologies. In this study, the mean macular thickness was thicker in eyes with strabismic amblyopia, suggesting that patients with refractive amblyopia might have enjoyed better binocular vision during their life and thus might have a better prognosis for recovery.
| Conclusion|| |
The mean macular thickness is greater in amblyopic eyes as compared to the normal fellow eyes. On subgroup analysis, the difference is significant in strabismic amblyopia, and not significant in anisometropic amblyopia.
| References|| |
|1.||Reeves B. Taxonomy and epidemiology of amblyopia. In: Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, editors. Amblyopia: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2002. |
|2.||Flom MC, Bedell HE. Identifying amblyopia using associated conditions, acuity, and nonacuity features. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985;62:153-60. |
|3.||Headon MP, Powell TP. Cellular changes in the lateral geniculate nucleus of infant monkeys after suture of the eyelids. J Anat 1973;116:135-45. |
|4.||Cleland BG, Mitchell DE, Gillard-Crewther S, Crewther DP. Visual resolution of retinal ganglion cells in monocularly-deprived cats. Brain Res 1980;192:261-6. |
|5.||von Noorden GK, Crawford ML. The lateral geniculate nucleus in human strabismic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:2729-32. |
|6.||Yen MY, Cheng CY, Wang AG. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in unilateral amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:2224-30. |
|7.||Gürses-Ozden R, Teng C, Vessani R, Zafar S, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement reproducibility using optical coherence tomography (OCT-3). J Glaucoma 2004;13:238-44. |
|8.||Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, Stark PC, Beaton S, Ishikawa H, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1716-24. |
|9.||Huynh SC, Wang XY, Burlutsky G, Mitchell P. Symmetry of optical coherence tomography retinal measurements in young children. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:518-20. |
|10.||Wang XY, Huynh SC, Burlutsky G, Ip J, Stapleton F, Mitchell P. Reproducibility of and effect of magnification on optical coherence tomography measurements in children. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:484-8. |
|11.||Huynh SC, Wang XY, Rochtchina E, Mitchell P. Distribution of macular thickness by optical coherence tomography: Findings from a population-based study of 6-year-old children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:2351-7. |
|12.||Huynh SC, Samarawickrama C, Wang XY, Rochtchina E, Wong TY, Gole GA, et al. Macular and nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopia: The Sydney childhood eye study. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1604-9. |
|13.||Altintas O, Yüksel N, Ozkan B, Caglar Y. Thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer, macular thickness, and macular volume in patients with strabismic amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2005;42:216-21. |
|14.||Yoon SW, Park WH, Baek SH, Kong SM. Thicknesses of macular retinal layer and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer in patients with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia. Korean J Ophthalmol 2005;19:62-7. |
|15.||Repka MX, Kraker RT, Tamkins SM, Suh DW, Sala NA, Roy W. Beck: Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:247-51. |
|16.||Park KA, Park DY, Oh SY. Analysis of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography measurements in amblyopia: A pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:1700-6. |
|17.||Stewart CE, Fielder AR, Stephens DA, Moseley MJ. Treatment of unilateral amblyopia: Factors influencing visual outcome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:3152-60. |
|18.||Friedman Z, Neumann E, Hyams SW, Peleg B. Ophthalmic screening of 38,000 children, age 1 to 2 1/2 years, in child welfare clinics. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1980;17:261-7. |
|19.||McNeil NL. Patterns on visual defects in children. Br J Ophthalmol 1955;39:688-701. |
|20.||Wendell-smith CP. Effect of light deprivation on the postnatal development of the optic nerve. Nature 1964;204:707. |
|21.||Arden GB, Wooding SL. Pattern ERG in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:88-96. |
|22.||Tan JC, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Magnification changes in scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma 2004; 13:137-41. |
|23.||Salchow DJ, Oleynikov YS, Chiang MF, Kennedy-Salchow SE, Langton K, Tsai JC, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal children measured with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2006;113:786-91. |
|24.||Landa E, Rumelt S, Yahalom C, Wong E, Kowal L. Amblyopia and foveal thickness In: Rumelt S, Editor. Advances in Ophthalmology. Croatia. Intech; 2012. p. 281-6. |
|25.||Wolf-Schnurrbusch UE, Ceklic L, Brinkmann CK, Iliev ME, Frey M, Rothenbuehler SP, et al. Macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using six different optical coherence tomography instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:3432-7. |
|26.||Al-Haddad CE, Mollayess GM, Cherfan CG, Jaafar DF, Bashshur ZF. Retinal nerve fibre layer and macular thickness in amblyopia as measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:1696-9. |
|27.||Levi DM, Klein S. Hyperacuity and amblyopia. Nature 1982;298:268-70. |
|28.||Manny RE, Levi DM. Psychophysical investigations of the temporal modulation sensitivity function in amblyopia: Spatiotemporal interactions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1982;22:525-34. |
|29.||Levi DM, Klein S. Differences in vernier discrimination for grating between strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1982;23:398-407. |
[Table 1], [Table 2]