Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Table 2: Comparison of 360-degree average and quadrant-wise RNFL thickness using one-way ANOVA. There is a significant decrease in RNFL thickness (in μm) in 360-degree average, superior quadrant, inferior quadrant, and nasal quadrant while insignificant change is seen in temporal quadrant. (P < 0.05 is considered significant) (N: Number of eyes in the group)

Table 2: Comparison of 360-degree average and quadrant-wise RNFL thickness using one-way ANOVA. There is a significant decrease in RNFL thickness (in μm) in 360-degree average, superior quadrant, inferior quadrant, and nasal quadrant while insignificant change is seen in temporal quadrant. (<i>P</i> < 0.05 is considered significant) (N: Number of eyes in the group)